Tri-State's Innovation Working Group (IWG) Program

A key mechanism for facilitating collaborations is the Tri-State’s Innovation Working Group (IWG) Program, which supports collaborative, trans-disciplinary work by the three member states. The IWG provides a venue for engaging scientists and educators, along with key nationally and internationally recognized experts. This program supports week-long working group activities that are modeled after those hosted by the highly successful NSF-supported National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS).

IWGs

January 2013: Building resilience in water governance: an interdisciplinary investigation into the social-ecological system dynamics of climate change, Melinda Benson (Synergia Ranch, New Mexico)
February 2011: Indicators of Ecological Thresholds, Robert Heinse (University of Idaho)
February 2011: CyberEnabled Science IWG, Karl Benedict (University of New Mexico)
September 2010: Western Tri-State Diversity Innovation Working Group, Michele Casella (Nevada EPSCoR)
May 2010: Identifying the Most Relevant Spatial and Temporal Scales of Climate Change with Respect to Surface Hydrologic Processes, Amanda White (New Mexico Tech)
March 2010: Paleo-rainfall and Groundwater Recharge in Southern Nevada over the Past 11,000 Years from Cave Calcite Deposits, Matthew Lachniet (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
October 2009: The Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Societies: A Focus on Native American and Hispanic Communities, Karletta Chief (Desert Research Institute)
Additional New Mexico EPSCoR IWGs


February 2011: Indicators of Ecological Thresholds, Robert Heinse (University of Idaho)

Ecosystems respond nonlinearly to environmental stressors which can lead to drastic and irreversible change. This Innovative Working Group (IWG) met to identify cross-disciplinary approaches for detecting trends of ecosystem response amidst natural variability via complementary and quasi-orthogonal indicators.
 
The ability to predict, identify and manage ecosystems at the brink of unexpected thresholds clear of historical and current experience is critical for environmental management. The inelasticity of societal responses to abrupt changes in ecosystems and associated dramatic reductions in ecosystem services highlights the urgency regarding thresholds because of the escalating pace of changing drivers and increasing vulnerabilities of ecosystem services. A spectrum of indicators is currently being used to track these responses and identify tipping points for vulnerable ecosystems, especially in regards to climate change. However, complexities and insufficient deterministic understanding of ecosystem functions suggest that not one indicator may describe ecosystem resilience, but that integrated or cascading indicators may provide better predictive measures for ecosystem change triggers. This IWG examined approaches for detecting trends of ecosystem response amidst natural variability across different disciplines. We convened a cross-disciplinary group of researchers to explore a collaborative process of model development including a wide spectrum of metrics. The interdisciplinary nature of the problem suggested a unique opportunity to leverage efforts across disciplines and apply it to study risks in coupled ecosystem-human interactions.  IWG Participants represented ecology, hydrology, socioeconomics, sociology, statistics, and remote sensing, with foci’s integrating across different spatial and temporal scales. Immediate results of the IWG include proposing two sessions at the 2011 American Geophysical Union meeting, developing a synthesis paper of approaches for interdisciplinary indicator assessment, and pursue two grant opportunities.
Read More
Idaho EPSCoR Nevada EPSCoR New Mexico EPSCoR
This material is based in part upon work supported by: The National Science Foundation under grant number(s) IIA-1329469, IIA-1329470 and IIA-1329513. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.